Mancan: the latest thing I hate.

In Uncategorized on November 24, 2015 at 3:08 pm

I’m not going to link to it, because I don’t want to run the risk of driving traffic to their website, but suffice it to say, yet another product has hit the market that is trading on the tropes of wine being “too complicated” and “not manly”, both premises that I find generally offensive. Here’s why.

  1. The “man” part. There is an implication inherent any time you put the word ‘man’ in front of any other word: that whatever it is was once not for men, but now it is. Purses aren’t for men? Solution: man-purse! Chapstick too girly? Boom! Dude-stick (yes, that’s a real thing). Want to enjoy a refreshing glass of sangria without being in danger of having your man-card revoked? Magria (also real). Want to put your flowing locks up, but don’t want anybody equating it with some wussy girl hairstyle? Man-bun. Want to drink wine, but afraid your friends will call you a faggot for using a wine glass? Mancan. Gender equality can go fuck a rock.
  2. You’re giving canned wine a bad name. I don’t object to wine being put in a can. At all. Ten years ago, nobody thought craft beer in a can would ever fly, and guess what! But Mancan trades on nothing but the gimmick of its packaging, you can tell by the name. There are two aspects to this wine. It is for dudes, and it is in a can. I’m all for quality wine in alternative packaging. I take canned and boxed wine camping all the time. It’s lightweight and convenient, it’s great! But I take those wines because I think they’re quality wines, regardless of their packaging. And to be clear, I have not even tried these wines, and for all I know, what’s in the can could be totally legit juice. But the packaging will still be profoundly stupid and misogynistic.
  3. Mancan is not original. Sorry, can-bro, but you’re not breaking any new ground here. Wine in a can has been on the market for several years at this point, so your product whose only distinguishing factor is the fact that it’s in a can just isn’t that interesting.
  4. This quote from the website: “OUT WITH A FRIEND AT A BAR, GRAHAM WISHED HE COULD ORDER WINE, BUT DIDN’T WANT A “SAUVIGNON BLANC” OR “PINOT” IN STEMWARE WHEN HIS FRIEND HAD A CAN OF BEER. HE BOUGHT MANCANWINE.COM THAT NIGHT.”   Graham sounds like a cartoonishly insecure douchebag. Seriously bro-Graham, if your masculinity is so fragile that you’re unwilling to touch a wine glass, I think you need to do some soul-searching.
  5. Seriously, what the fuck is up with the quotation marks around the grape varieties? It’s not like Pinot Noir is a nickname, or slang, or colloquialism. It’s just the name of the grape. I’m sincerely asking this question here: do you know the purpose of quotation marks? I’m not even judging. It’s not your fault brah, the public school system failed you. The internet is here to help. 
  6. Now that I think of it, what bar were you in where your bro-friend was actually drinking beer out of a can? Again, I’m not judging, it’s just that the story doesn’t hold together. I can only think of two circumstances where one would normally be drinking beer from a can in a bar; either it’s a dive bar where you’re drinking Beast Ice ironically because it’s 50 cents a can during happy hour, or it’s a progressive craft bar that serves one of the many great craft beers now available in a can. The thing is, if it’s the dive bar, you really shouldn’t drink the wine there anyway, and if it’s the craft bar, don’t they serve the can with a pint glass? I’m just saying.
  7. I want to flesh out the misogyny inherent in this attitude that certain things are for women, and are therefore unmasculine and gross/embarrassing/shameful. You understand that the inherent implication there is that it is gross/embarrassing/shameful to be a woman, right? And, I mean, if that’s the way you feel, I guess that’s a whole different issue, but if it’s not, you seriously need to spend some time on introspection. Personally, I love women. A woman carried me in her body, which I super appreciate, and every person I’ve ever done naked bedroom wrestling with has been a woman, and I legit LOVE naked bedroom wrestling.
  8. Finally, where does this idea that wine isn’t dudely enough even come from? Seriously, wine gets you drunk just as good as beer does, guys.

Dear every winery website

In Uncategorized on June 10, 2015 at 10:50 am

Dear every wine website,

Please stop asking me for my goddamn date of birth just to get onto your website. If I actually buy something, yeah, totally, check my ID, whatever, but I’m just here looking for information. Access to that information is going to make it easier for me to sell your products. And come on, you know I’m not actually taking the time to scroll to my actual birthday. I’m willing to bet you’ve got an overwhelming shitload of logins claiming to be born on January 1.

I’m assuming I’m not gonna get a lot of pushback on this argument, but just in case I do, let’s address every argument I can think of for why this age verification should exist.

“Alcohol is restricted. Minors aren’t allowed to have it.” Well, that’s so, but information about alcohol is not alcohol. And more importantly, minors are every bit as capable as the rest of us of lying, so this feature is doing literally absolutely nothing.

And that’s all. That’s the only reason that exists for making me pick a random date before 1994 before I can get on your website and find out how much Zinfandel is in your proprietary red blend.

I know, I know, they’re only doing it because they have to, right? I’m assuming that’s the case. Some legislator somewhere decided that this extra step had to exist, so I’d like to talk to that legislator real quick….

Fuck you, dude. Seriously, you couldn’t find anything better to do with your time than enact an idiotic piece of legislation that has the capacity to do absolutely nothing besides annoy the shit out of people looking for information about wine? Seriously, you think a winery website is gonna be the gateway getting minors into alcohol? You think teenagers are going to winery websites to score their first buzz? Really? Seriously, you think teenagers are starting on wine? Because they are not. They’re asking their older brothers, neighborhood degenerates, and local homeless people to buy them Joose and FourLoko at the gas station. Like normal teenagers. You dumb dick.

I’m legitimately sick of having this conversation.

In Uncategorized on May 31, 2015 at 5:49 pm

It happened again. Somebody got on a mission to prove that wine snobs are all full of shit, and then did a ‘study’ to prove it, and now it’s all over my goddamn Facebook, and I am sick of it. Joss Fong published a column entitled Expensive Wine is for Suckers. With all due respect to Mr Fong (very little), I’d like to suggest he cram this title up his ass.

I’ve tried hard to de-mistify wine over the last 13 years because I really like wine, and I want more people to be able to enjoy it. I make a specific effort to taste wines of all different styles, even styles which I don’t generally enjoy myself, just so I can remain as objective as possible in my assessments, and thereby be as helpful as possible when trying to help somebody choose the right wine for the right situation.

The trouble with this article, and most like it is, first and foremost, the title. It’s deliberately confrontational and sensationalist, and furthers the idea that there are these “wine snobs” out there who are looking down on you if you don’t know what “leesy” means. And I’m not saying that those people don’t exist, but those people are assholes independent of their interest in wine. If wine just suddenly disappeared from the face of the earth, those people would find something else to be condescending and snobby about. The rest of the wine-drinking world, and particularly the wine industry, is not out to get you just because you don’t know as much as us. You shouldn’t know as much as I do about wine. I’ve been doing this shit full-time for thirteen years. It would be outright irrational for somebody who doesn’t actually make a living in this industry to spend as much time and energy trying to learn all this crap. But do you know why I do that? Because it helps me sell wine to people. Not like a con artist who’s trying to figure out what are the right words to convince you to spend your rent on a bottle of rare Himalayan ice wine that’s harvested by sherpas and aged in barrels made out of the actual Noah’s Ark. I want to know as much about wine as I can so I can help you find the right wine for you. If you like that Santa Rita Cabernet more than the Honig Napa Cabernet, chances are you like a wine that’s basically just fruity and unassuming, and seriously that is fine with me. I can find you something that will work for you, just don’t try to make me feel like an asshole if I tell you that I genuinely prefer a more expensive wine.

The other problem with this article and others like it is food. This is a problem inherent to the wine press that is mentioned in the video, and seems to be all throughout the wine-reviewing industry. Wine tastes different with food. I don’t expect I need to get too deep into the science here. In my experience, most people who are shopping for wine are looking to have it with food. And even if they’re not, that’s a choice as well that’s going to impact your perception of the wine. Sugar, acid, tannins, and all the other chemical compounds in a wine will be perceived differently when put alongside different food pairings. Applying this to the Vox tasting, it can be generally assumed that an inexpensive wine is made to be drunk straightaway, and not specifically intended to go with food. Whereas the winemaker of the Honig almost certainly made his wine with the intention that 1) it be cellared for at least a few years and 2) it be consumed with food. The Santa Rita is literally made for these tasting conditions- it is meant to show it’s best straight out of the bottle, no aeration needed, and can be as easily appreciated in an office/video studio, as in an actual human environment. And it won’t suffer significantly from being served in COMPLETELY the wrong glassware, I mean come the fuck on, where the hell did you even get those glasses, Vox? Did you have a martini tasting last week and just bought too many glasses? Jesus tapdancing christ!

Ok, I’m calmed down now.

The other problem inherent to these “gotcha” articles that seem aimed at proving that people who claim to know things about wine actually don’t is the spurious nature of the qualifications of the judges they employ. Articles like this one will sometimes even tout the lack of experience of their tasters in an attempt to demonstrate the inherent objectivity of the palate of the common man. Or something. And here’s the thing, again, if you don’t drink a ton of wine, and you can’t tell the difference between the Honig and the Santa Rita, or you can tell the difference but you still like the cheaper one, that’s fine. Sincerely, it is. I don’t care. You should have what you like. But just because an admittedly inexperienced wine drinker prefers inexpensive wine, that doesn’t mean that people who enjoy more expensive wines are suckers. It’s exactly the same as developing a taste for any other subtly nuanced thing, whether it be food or cocktails or music or movies. I can’t tell the difference between good Dubstep and bad Dubstep, and I’m not using that as an example to make a joke about how Dubstep sucks, it just all sounds the same to me. But if you tell me you really really love dubstep, you’ve dedicated your career to becoming an expert in Dubstep, and then one day I need to buy a bottle of Dubstep, I’m gonna come to you, and I’m gonna trust your opinion, because you know a whole shitload about Dubstep, and all I know is this one time Deadmau5 played this prank on Skrillex.

Lesson learned-people who are assholes about wine are such because they are assholes, not because of the wine.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 113 other followers